[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Skåne Sjælland Linux User Group - http://www.sslug.dk Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Forum   Calendar   Search
MhonArc Date: [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]   Thread: [Date Prev] [Thread Index] [Date Next]   MhonArc
 

Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_[ITPOLITIK]_patenter_på_leverpostej?=



Erik Lange wrote:
> 
> At 09:20 PM 5/10/02, Morten Skaarup Jensen wrote:
> >On Friday 10 May 2002 10:51, you wrote:
> > >
> > > Eller skal de bare skynde sig at udtage nogle patenter selv, så de kan
> > > krydslicensere med evt. sagsøgere (Sådan som f.eks. Navision anbefaler små
> > > softwarevirksomheder at gøre - det ser jo ud til at ha' virket for dem) ?
> > > Er det her Hanegal har fejlet, og er det ikke deres egen skyld, at de ikke
> > > ønsker at patentere deres produkter, men kun bekymrer sig om at fremstille
> > > gode varer for at gi' forbrugerne et reelt valg ?
> >
> >Den der med krydslicenser er jo ikke engang  sikker. Hvad hvis en patent haj
> >(et firma der kun har patenter og ikke producerer noget) sagsøger for
> >patentkrænkelse? så kan man ikke bare krydslicensere.
> 
> Det har du ret i - man kan efter min mening dog godt både være patent og
> producere noget.
> 
> Danish Crown producerer jo unægteligt noget - bare ikke fedtfattig leverpostej.
> 
> De tilbyder nu Hanegal en licens, for at få "lov" til at lave "deres"
> postej - det er for mig at se pirateri, når de ikke engang selv laver et
> tilsvarende produkt. Det er ihvertfald ikke for at beskytte deres egen
> "opfindelse" - den eksisterer jo ikke i praksis ;-)
>

Hvor kan man læse selve patentbeskrivelsen, der jo dækker langt bredere
end "fedtfattig økologisk leverpostej"?

Anne
-- 
Anne Østergaard, sslug@sslug http://www.sslug.dk


 
Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Index   Calendar   Search

 
 
Questions about the web-pages to <www_admin>. Last modified 2005-08-10, 20:16 CEST [an error occurred while processing this directive]
This page is maintained by [an error occurred while processing this directive]MHonArc [an error occurred while processing this directive] # [an error occurred while processing this directive] *